Back to Speakers

Stanley Herring, MD, FAMSSM

Stanley Herring, MD, FAMSSM

Stanley A. Herring, MD, is senior medical advisor and co-founder of The Sports Institute at UW Medicine, Co- medical director for Orthopedic Health and Sports Medicine for UW Medicine, and co-medical director of the UW Medicine Sports Concussion Program.

Dr. Herring is one of the team physicians for the Seattle Seahawks and the Seattle Mariners. His clinical practice focuses on the diagnosis and non-operative management of neurological and musculoskeletal injuries, particularly focusing on spinal disorders in active people and athletes as well as sports-related concussions.  

Dr. Herring is a clinical professor in the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, and Neurological Surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle and holds the Zachery Lystedt  Sports Concussion Endowed Chair. His philosophy is to provide kind and compassionate care that focuses not only on the relief of pain and suffering, but also helps patients return to activities that give them quality of life.

Education and Training
UW - Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine - Residency, 1982, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Univ. of Texas Southwestern - Medical Education, 1979
UW - Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine - Teaching Appointment

Board Certifications
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1983, American Board of Physical Medicine & Rehab

Content Where I Am Featured

Sort By
Search by Favorites
Search by Keyword
  • Contains 6 Component(s), Includes Credits

    In today's litigious society, it is critical for athletic trainers to have an understanding of the legal system and how to perform in a legal deposition. This session will simulate a formal legal deposition and will include a trial attorney with extensive experience in sports medicine cases interviewing an athletic trainer and team physician regarding their care of a fictitious athlete who sustained a concussion with complications secondary to initial care. The attorney will stop at different points in the deposition to provide feedback to attendees on rationale for lines of questioning and appropriate and inappropriate responses.